Mid century shelving systems 2026

Updated January 2026

Looking at the stats for this blog, my most viewed post every year is usually the round-up of mid century shelving systems that I compiled all the way back in 2017 so for my first post of 2026, I thought I’d do an update.

Almost 10 years on, I’m still very fond of mid century-inspired wall-mounted shelving systems and the Poul Cadovius royal system that I inherited from my father still has pride of place on the wall of our living room.

Poul Cadovius Royal System in Great Brownings living room

In terms of what else is available on the market, all of the design classics that I covered in 2017 are still available but some of the high street offerings have been discontinued or replaced.

Here are my picks (with an option for every price point):

1. dk3 Royal System (£££)

While I prefer the original, chunkier version of the Cado royal system, I think that the modern slimline version reissued by dk3 still looks great and looks more contemporary. It comes in oak and walnut.

img_5966
dk3 Royal System
img_5972
dk3 Royal System detail
img_5974
dk3 Royal System

2. Vitsoe 606 system (£££)

These are a tad officey-looking but I’ve seen them in various high-end homes and they always look great. For me, the best use of Vitsoe shelving is as a room divider as per this studio flat in the Barbican.

img_5922
Vitsoe 606 system – wall configuration
img_5960
Vitsoe 606 system – different wall configurations
img_5935
Vitsoe 606 system – wall configuration

3. String shelving system (££)

Although it’s still ubiquitous and a Scandi cliche these days, I still think String shelving elevates any room. Having put String shelving up in most rooms of our house (kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms), I would say it looks great but it’s a little flimsy – I don’t think I would rely on the wall-mounted version to bear the weight of anything heavier than a few ornaments, paperback books and toiletries.

img_5930-1
String shelving white wall configuration
img_5962
String shelving walnut and white configurations (with desk)
img_5929
String shelving low white wall configuration

4. Hay Pier System (££)

Hay’s streamlined, minimalistic version of a modular shelving system on rails is made out of lightweight aluminium and steel and is available in a variety of colours and set configurations that can be combined with each other.

Hay Pier System black wall configuration
Hay Pier System white wall configuration
Hay Pier System white wall configuration detail

5. On-Wall office shelving (££)

The On-Wall modular shelving system consists of steel wall uprights, plate-like brackets and lightweight shelf boards. Again, it looks a little corporate but when used in a domestic setting, it resembles the more expensive Vitsoe system, especially the drawer units.

On Wall white wall configuration
On Wall white wall configuration detail
On Wall white wall configuration

6. La Redoute Archivita set (££)

The Architvita shelving system looks like an updated version of the Taktik system that I featured in my post from 2017 – it seems to feature the similar vertical metal rails as before (though La Redoute has stressed that the two systems are not compatible) but the shelves and cabinetry have been updated and refined.

Architvita shelving system in walnut
Architvita shelving system in walnut
Architvita shelving system in walnut

7. IKEA Boaxel system (£)

IKEA has discontinued its Svalnas wooden wall mounted shelving system but those who want to install something modular on a budget can look to Boaxel, its flexible, wall-mounted storage solution, most commonly used in closets, bedrooms, and utility areas. I’m not sure about the version with oak veneer shelves but I love how the white version looks in the living room examples pictured here – it’s pretty similar to the more expensive examples in this list.

IKEA shelving system with white shelves
IKEA shelving system with oak veneer shelves
IKEA shelving system examples – detail

Carl Larsson-gården (Lilla Hyttnäs), Sundborn Sweden

During a recent trip to Stockholm (which unlike neighbouring capitals Oslo, Helsinki and Copenhagen seemed to have a dearth of mid century/modernist attractions), I decided to make the long journey north to visit Lilla Hyttnäs, a late 1800s cottage and the home of Carl and Karin Larsson, in the tiny village of Sundborn outside Falun in Dalarna.

Carl Larsson house, main entrance

While the cottage predates the mid-century modern period that I usually focus on by over half a century, the Larssons pioneered a distinctly Scandinavian approach to domestic design (light, colour, craft and simplicity) that shaped the sensibilities later associated with Nordic modernism and the interiors (bold, bright and strikingly modern-looking for their time) became the blueprint for a whole national aesthetic. IKEA reportedly makes regular pilgrimages to the cottage: a busload of designers visits annually, mining ideas for future products and the Larssons’ influence on IKEA’s aesthetic and product line is unmistakable.

Carl Larsson house, house exterior from garden
Carl Larsson house, house exterior
Carl Larsson house, house exterior from garden

Our trip to the village and the cottage felt faintly folkloric: a three hour train journey to Falun, followed by an infrequent rural bus or a prohibitively expensive taxi to Sundborn (I chose the latter: £45 for a fifteen-minute drive) but all of this added to the sense of pilgrimage.

Carl Larsson house, Sundborn village
Carl Larsson house, Sundborn village
Carl Larsson house, view of river from garden

The village of Sundborn consisted of a scatter of deep Falu-red wooden houses along the Sundborn river with the Larssons’ home as its centrepiece. On the freezing November day that we visited, both the village and the grounds of the property were deserted and we were met by a single, very knowledgeable guide who took us on a private tour of the cottage (private because we seemed to be the only visitors to the village that day). Unfortunately, photography was not allowed inside as the cottage is still owned and very much used as a home by members of the Larsson family (small signs of life could be seen amidst the preserved, museum-like rooms) but I managed to find a lot of photos of the interiors online to accompany this entry.

Carl Larsson house, exterior detail
Carl Larsson house, exterior detail
Carl Larsson house, exterior detail

Carl Larsson, born in 1853 into poverty, was lifted out of hardship by teachers who recognised his talent and helped him into the Royal Swedish Academy of Art. He worked in Stockholm, struggled, moved to Paris, struggled even more, and eventually found his footing in a rural artists’ colony outside the city. The light, the water, and the community suited him.

Carl Larsson house, exterior
Carl Larsson house, exterior detail
Carl Larsson house, view of river from garden

Meanwhile Karin Bergöö, born into a more prosperous family, trained at the Art Academy in Stockholm. She and Carl met in France, married, and eventually returned to Sweden. Karin’s father gifted them Lilla Hyttnäs in 1888: at that time a tiny cottage of four rooms and a kitchen.

Carl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn village
Carl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn village
Carl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn village

What followed was a slow transformation, with extensions added between 1888 and 1912. By the time that the Larssons had settled permanently in 1900, the house had grown to about thirteen rooms, each with its own character and shaped by the interplay of Carl’s painting and Karin’s revolutionary approach to textiles, colour, and furniture design.

Carl Larsson house, garden (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, views of river from garden of house
Carl Larsson house, exterior of house from garden

We began in what had effectively been the family studio-workroom. This was where Carl painted and where Karin wove textiles on her loom – the guide pointed out a folksy cushion decorated in a very contemporary looking hearts and tears motif (symbols of hope and devotion) that a designer like Donna Wilson might make nowadays.

Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )
Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom detail (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )
Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)

Next door was the dining room, which occupied one of the oldest parts of the house, the original cottage from the early 19th century. This space was dark and richly coloured in deep reds and greens. Meals were eaten in this room at a long table with a family-tree tablecloth designed by Karin under curling red lampshades designed by Carl. A heavily decorated cupboard known jokingly as the “cupboard of sins” (which concealed the kitchen door) stored liquid tobacco and various illicit “medicinal” alcohols.

Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)

Adjoining the dining room was perhaps the most famous room in the house given that it was depicted in 24 of Carl’s paintings, including the iconic Flower Window from 1894. The living room was a warm, lived-in space with a tiled stove in the corner (above which, flowers climbing up to the ceiling had been painted) and windows overlooking the Sundborn river. The white wooden furniture and balustrades and pale blue and white textiles looked familiar, partly because IKEA’s design language is so saturated with echoes of it.

Carl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Girl Watering Flowers On Windowsill, Carl Larsson
Carl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Cosy Corner by Carl Larsson
Carl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)

Upstairs were a number of guest rooms and bedrooms which seemed to run into and connect with one another in a warren-like manner.

Carl Larsson house, staircase (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, upstairs library (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, library room tablecloth detail (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )

A wood paneled guest room, added in 1901, was furnished with a vast floor-to-ceiling carved cupboard from a German church. A traditional Swedish box-bed sat against the wall – short, enclosed, and designed for sleeping propped upright rather than lying flat. A commode hidden under a woven cushion in the corner reminded me that this was a 19th century house though the family have reportedly added a modern bathroom to the private quarters of the building.

Carl Larsson house, guest room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, guest room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, washroom and children’s room (photos by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)

The family slept in two adjoining bedrooms. Karin and the younger children used a bright, white-walled nursery-like room with green painted ceilings which featured yet more familiar looking pieces (IKEA has replicated the sleigh-style bed and the iron chandelier from this room).

Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )
Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s bedroom – Rose of Love curtain (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)

This room was separated by a curtain embroidered with a Rose of Love motif from Carl’s bedroom, which featured a single bed placed in the centre of the room, surrounded by textiles like a four-poster tent, with windows, cupboards, and doors lining the walls of the room. Unusually, there was a small interior window in that looked down to the studio-workshop so Carl could view his paintings from a distance.

Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)

Back downstairs, a long corridor displaying works by artist friends, led to a large, dramatic studio space, built in 1889. Carl erected an internal wall to ensure the light entered only from the south, the way he preferred. A modern-looking rocking chair designed by Karin and since reproduced by IKEA (and I’m sure I’ve owned one from Habitat that looked like it) sat by the window. A tiny staircase (so narrow and steep that you’d never design one like it today) led from the studio up to additional bedrooms, another quirk that again reminded me that for all its modernity, Lilla Hyttnäs was still a 19th-century cottage at heart.

Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Carl Larsson house, studio space (photos by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg and Carl Larsson website)
Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)

The last addition, completed in 1910, was a small cottage attached to the house used variously as a guest room and Carl’s writing room. The final sentence he ever wrote before he died of a stroke in 1919 was preserved on the desk.

Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)

Karin lived until 1928, spending summers at Sundborn until she moved to be closer to her children. In the 1930s, the Larsson children decided to preserve the house as a museum, while still using it as a holiday home. It remains hugely popular in the summer months, a living monument to the style their parents helped to create.

Carl Larsson house, main entrance of house

Stockholm round-up

As well as visiting the Larsson house, I visited another few places of tangential interest to this blog (as I mentioned above, Stockholm is not really a mid century/modernist city).

View from roof of Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum

Millesgården, on the island of Lidingö, turned out to be far more expansive and stranger than I expected. The site was really three places in one: the modernist museum building, which during my visit hosted a beautifully curated Alvar and Aino Aalto exhibition; the original artist’s house, gingerbread-trimmed and storybook-like on the outside but surprisingly grand and palazzo-esque inside; and, tucked a little to the side, the 1950s cottage built for the artist’s secretary, perfectly preserved and quietly tasteful in that now-familiar Scandinavian style.

Millesgården modernist museum building and Alvar and Aino Aalto exhibition
Millesgården museum terrace
Millesgården 1950s cottage built for the artist’s secretary

All of this was layered across terraced sculpture gardens overlooking the water, with Carl Milles’ dramatic bronzes scattered across the hillside, giving the whole place a slightly otherworldly but alluring atmosphere – somewhere between a Mediterranean villa, an artist’s fantasy garden, and a piece of mid-century time travel.

Millesgården museum artist’s house
Millesgården museum terrace sculptures
Millesgården museum artist’s house

Even stranger, in a compelling, slightly uncanny way, was Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, a golden metal-clad building in Vasaparken that hid a full-scale replica of a floor of Sven-Harry’s own 1920s house on the roof. Walking through this simulated house complete with what looked like a working kitchen and a fake crackling fireplace, suspended above the city, felt more like stepping onto a film set or a dream reconstruction than visiting a museum. Everything was immaculate (and the domestic setting provided an unusual and unique way to display Sven-Harry’s impressive art collection) but off-kilter.

Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house exterior
Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house hallway
Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house interior

And finally, for shopping, I went across town to Ryttargatan Vintage, a sort of indoor flea market open only on weekends from 11 to 3. Compared to almost everything else in Stockholm, the prices felt improbably low. The place sold a large range of Swedish glassware, pottery, textiles, paintings, homewares and clothing.

Ryttargatan Vintage

Photo sources for images of interior of Carl Larsson house:

https://magniberg.com/blogs/projects/meet-the-larssons?srsltid=AfmBOorj0iBZDpPm–2YZcGPrSKEoePyAuAOXSmmpIBSodkfNfJ6FAAA

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/t-magazine/carl-karin-larsson-sweden-home.html

https://www.carllarsson.se/en/garden/

https://www.unt.se/nyheter/bostads-stadsplaneringsfragor/artikel/karin-larsson-var-sin-tids-influencer/lyo6ddpr

Woodhall Drive, Dulwich SE21

If we were ever to move on from Great Brownings, it would likely be to Woodhall Drive, another Austin Vernon and Partners estate just down the road. I’ve admired it for some time and sometimes cycle through it – I suspect that this isn’t especially appreciated by its residents – just to admire how the American-style suburbia of it all.

Woodhall Drive, estate exterior

Built between 1959 and 1966 by Austin Vernon and Partners for the Dulwich Estate, Woodhall Drive was conceived as a kind of architectural experiment – a low-density, American-inspired enclave of ranch-style houses, arranged around winding unadopted roads and open lawns.

Woodhall Drive, College Road entrance
Woodhall Drive, estate exterior shots
Woodhall Drive, estate exterior

The 42 houses were individually designed (most by Victor Knight with later contributions from Manfred Bresgen, and executed by Wates) and the development won the Ministry of Housing Award for Good Design in 1967, praised for its sensitivity to the sloping site, its long low rooflines and restrained use of materials – grey slate, brick, and painted boarding.

Woodhall Drive, estate exterior
Woodhall Drive, examples of different house types on estate (photos from Rightmove)
Woodhall Drive, one of the rolling lawns

More than half a century later, the landscaping by Derek Lovejoy & Associates, which features rolling lawns merging into one another and trees framing each house, remains pretty much intact. The same can’t be said for a lot of the houses, however – it seems that the Dulwich Estate has been quite relaxed about allowing extensions and alterations on the estate and quite a few owners have turned their houses into sleek, glassy mansions. Still, enough of the original architecture survives for the estate’s character to be felt.

Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photos from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photo from The Modern House)

As far as I’m aware, there were around five different types of house on the estate of varying sizes and with range of different floorplans.

Woodhall Drive, split-level living room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, rooms in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, hallway in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)

My favourite of the house types that I’ve seen (Type A, an example of which is pictured in these photos of a house previously listed by The Modern House) has a double height staircase and a split level living room with a chunky brick fireplace that acts a room divider between living and dining rooms.

Woodhall Drive, split-level living room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, hallway in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
Woodhall Drive, split-level dining room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)

I had the opportunity to look around one of the other house types on the estate earlier this year. This was one of the smaller type D houses (at least I think so, based on the limited amount of information about Woodhall Drive available online) and in relatively unaltered condition. The asking price reflected this: fair, and a bit lower than all of the figures I’ve seen other houses on the estate go for in the past.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house façade
Woodhall Drive, Type D house side elevation
Woodhall Drive, Type D house façade

I thought that the front of the house was attractive on first impressions: the façade featured a mix of brick and timber cladding, a low-pitched gable roof, narrow clerestory windows and an integrated double garage. The garden, which wrapped around the house, was beautifully kept but almost too large for someone with my level of gardening ability.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house wraparound garden
Woodhall Drive, Type D house wraparound garden
Woodhall Drive, Type D house wraparound garden

Inside, a central hallway with an open-tread staircase (though not the dramatic double-height kind found in some of the other house types pictured above) led to the kitchen, dining room and living room on one side of the house and study, bathroom/utility and garage on the other.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house porch
Woodhall Drive, Type D house hallway
Woodhall Drive, Type D house corridor

The living room was bright and well-proportioned with direct access to the garden and the separate dining room, probably my favourite room in this house, was light-filled and overlooked the garden – I would have asked the sellers to include the mid century furniture in this room as part of the sale.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house living room
Woodhall Drive, Type D house dining room
Woodhall Drive, Type D house living and dining rooms

Upstairs, a long corridor ran the length of the house, connecting two large double bedrooms (the master bedroom was an extremely large sea of green with an ensuite) at either end, with two smaller single rooms and a family bathroom between them.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house upstairs hallway
Woodhall Drive, Type D house master bedroom
Woodhall Drive, Type D house view of garden from master bedroom

Walking through the house and garden, I was struck by its potential and so was someone else as it sold quickly after my viewing.

Woodhall Drive, Type D house rear elevation

Western Garden Cities, Amsterdam

Having visited the Rietveld Schröder and Van Ravestyn houses in Utrecht, we moved on to Amsterdam.

Western Garden Cities

A short tram ride west from the centre of the city was Westelijke Tuinsteden (the Western Garden Cities), an ambitious post-war housing development that was as much an open-air museum as it was a living neighbourhood – I’d never seen anything quite like it.

Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing

Planned in 1935 by urbanist Cornelis van Eesteren under the General Extension Plan, the Garden Cities were built to answer Amsterdam’s chronic housing shortage and shaped around the principles of light, air and space, conveying the optimism of a post-war generation that believed good housing could transform not only a city, but the people who lived within it.

Western Garden Cities, zebra crossing
Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, river running through suburb

Laid out on a generous scale with broad avenues, landscaped courtyards and housing blocks carefully positioned to catch the sun, the district became home to around 100,000 residents in the 1950s and 60s. A river ran through the suburb, threading water and greenery through the urban space.

Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing

The architecture was varied and experimental while still maintaining a cohesive style overall. Slab blocks and duplex houses stood beside bold public buildings including a 1950s H-shaped school and a striking brutalist yellow-trimmed building.

Western Garden Cities, brutalist public building
Western Garden Cities, brutalist public building
Western Garden Cities, relief on side of public building

A tour conducted entirely in Dutch (I had no idea what was going on at the time) took us around the neighbourhood, which looked well cared for with well maintained gardens and all facades intact.

Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing
Western Garden Cities, housing

A restored flat maintained by the Van Eesteren Museum apartment on Freek Oxstraat showed how the principles of the Garden Cities extended to interior domestic spaces.

Western Garden Cities, view of Van Eesteren Museum
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment exterior and communal areas
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment exterior

The apartment, a modest 40-square-metre duplex, was arranged on two levels, with the entrance on the upper floor.

Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room

This opened onto a living room with wide window, a compact but modern kitchen (for the time) and a separate dining room – a distinction unusual in Dutch working-class housing at the time, where families had often eaten and lived in the same cramped space.

Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment kitchen
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment kitchen
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment separate dining room

A staircase led down to the apartment’s more private quarters: a handful of bedrooms and a bathroom, modest in size but laid out with efficiency.

Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment bedroom
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum bathroom, stairs and bedroom
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment bedroom

The design and decor of the apartment reflected the principles of Stichting Goed Wonen (the Association for Good Living), a foundation created after the Second World War by designers, architects and shopkeepers determined to teach people how to live well in their new homes.

Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room detail
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room detail
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment living room detail

Replacing the dark, heavy interiors of pre-war slum housing consisting of rooms crammed with carved wardrobes, velvet curtains and knick-knacks, the Stichting Goed Wonen aesthetic involved easy to clean bare lino floors, simple furniture (many designed by Premsela) lightweight enough to fold and move, built-in cupboards to keep clutter hidden and large windows to let daylight in.

Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment dining room detail
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment dining room
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museum apartment dining room detail

Every element was chosen to be functional, hygienic and modern and it was believed that this would nurture healthier, more forward-looking citizens. By the 1960s, these ideals had become fashionable, influencing not only housing but wider lifestyle and culture. The Goed Wonen philosophy even helped inspire the DNA of IKEA, with its emphasis on affordable, adaptable furnishings for the “common man.”

Western Garden Cities, by the river
Western Garden Cities, by the river
Western Garden Cities, by the river

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, Utrecht

Tucked into a small triangular plot a few minutes down the down from the Rietveld Schröder House was the intriguing Sybold van Ravesteyn house. Built out of sand-coloured railway bricks between 1932 and 1934 by Sybold van Ravestyn (an eccentric architect best known for designing train stations for the Dutch Railways), the house challenged architectural conventions of the time.

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, exterior

The plot – little more than a wedge-shaped leftover at the bend of a street – was just about big enough to fit the house, which consisted of a rectangular two-storey building with a semicircular volume and roof terrace on the first floor. A narrow garage – almost comically tight – was appended to the left side of the property, designed to form part of the overall silhouette of the house.

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, exterior
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, narrow garage and exterior detail
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, front garden

Inside, Van Ravesteyn maximised use of the small footprint by using narrow, steep stairs and installing curved walls to soften corners and guide movement around the house. 

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, hallway and staircase
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, staircase
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, hallway and staircase

The central part of the house was a large open plan living space with no dividing walls between the study, sitting room and dining room – an unusual concept at the time and one of the first examples of modern open plan living in the Netherlands.

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – sitting area
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – dining area
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – study area

This large open-plan space featured curved lines in the floor, a suspended ceiling of frosted glass in a steel frame and built-in furniture, which served to subtly zone the space into sitting, dining and working areas. 

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – built-in furniture
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – detail
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – suspended frosted glass ceiling

Though the house was practical in many ways (unusually for domestic buildings at the time, it had both central heating and plumbing throughout the house and a kitchen equipped with modern domestic appliances), Van Ravestyn resisted the cold minimalism often associated with early modernism, filling it with porcelain figurines, neo-Baroque decorative lines carved into the ceilings and built-in shelves that drew the eye across the room, their lines continuing into baseboards and shutter grooves.

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – detail
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, kitchen
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – built-in cupboards and furniture

Upstairs were three bedrooms and a bathroom. Van Ravestyn decided against installing traditional box beds in the bedrooms (still common in Dutch homes of the era) in favour of more modern free-standing beds flanked by built-in closets. The master bedroom featured a circular window with a bespoke shutter and an enormous terrace – larger than the bedroom itself. 

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroom
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroom – circular window and shutter
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroom – terrace

Each of the son’s bedroom and the guest room (where the family’s nanny stayed during her pregnancy, having been impregnated by Van Ravestyn himself – though this could have been a mistranslation!) each had their own basins and nightlights. 

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, upstairs landing
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, son and guest bedroom detail
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, son’s bedroom

Van Ravesteyn lived in the house until his nineties after which it was acquired and renovated by the Hendrick de Keyser Association. It has since served as a house museum and can be booked for overnight stays – something which gave the house a distinctly “lived in” feel. 

Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room in use

Rietveld Schröder House, Utrecht

Visiting the Rietveld Schröder House in Utrecht was like stepping into a physical representation of a Mondrian painting.

Rietveld Schröder House, exterior

Built in 1924 by the innovative architect Gerrit Rietveld (also famous for his Mondrian coded Red and Blue chair), the house was designed to be as much an artistic statement as a house in response to a brief from Truus Schröder-Schräder, a wealthy widowed mother of three with a penchant for avantgarde design.

Rietveld Schröder House, exterior and main entrance
Rietveld Schröder House, exterior

Rietveld, influenced by the De Stijl movement, aimed to create a space defined by flexibility, openness, and clarity. Though it was constructed during the same period as the traditional brick townhouses that surrounded it, it broke entirely from convention and is perhaps best known for its distinctive layout consisting of an adjustable open plan space that could be divided into separate rooms via a system of sliding panels.

Rietveld Schröder House, exterior and rear coffee shop
Rietveld Schröder House, exterior

Exterior

Despite being brick-built, the house looked as if it was made from concrete with its clean, white plaster surfaces and intersecting planes giving it a strikingly modern appearance even today. The building stood in sharp contrast to the neighbouring houses (and the terrace that it bookended) due to its abstract, cubic form and bold accents in red, black, and yellow.

Rietveld Schröder House, exterior
Rietveld Schröder House, close up of plaque

A thin red line across the façade of the house highlighted where to deliver parcels, blending functional design with visual clarity, a typical Rietveld detail. Also noticeable were structural beams and posts that ran from outside the house to inside, seamlessly connecting the interior to the exterior and a speaking tube that allowed Truus Schröder-Schräder to communicate with visitors at the front door from the first floor without having to go downstairs.

Rietveld Schröder House, exterior
Rietveld Schröder House, interior light fitting and beam running from interior to exterior of house

Ground Floor

The ground floor followed a traditional layout, divided into rooms for practical functions like cooking, working, and storage. The hallway was compact with a short flight of white steps leading upward beside a built-in bench. A wall unit accommodated storage for four occupants, and the coat rack was designed with both high and low sections, catering to both adults and children.

Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor hallway
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor hallway

The kitchen was equipped with features far ahead of its time: one of the first dishwashers, wall cabinets with sliding glass doors, a drop-down shelf by the window for deliveries and detachable shutters on the windows. The thick exposed pipes on the wall gave the room a modern, slightly industrial feel.

Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor kitchen
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor kitchen

The kitchen flowed through into the maid’s room, painted a cheerful sunny yellow to counteract the distinct lack of light. Unusually for the time, this room was wired for electricity and had its own sink and direct access to the garden, reflecting the importance placed by Rietveld and Truus Schröder-Schräder on maintaining independence and dignity for domestic workers. Later, this small space was rented to students.

Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor kitchen
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor maid’s room (with its own sink and access to garden) and workspace

Also on the ground floor was a workspace and a front room featuring a distinctive ceiling lamp, the design of which drew the eye upward, helping visitors perceive the three-dimensional volume of the room.

Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor front room with ceiling lamp
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor front room

First Floor

The first floor contained the most distinctive features of the house. Designed as a space for living during the day and sleeping at night, it was officially listed as an attic to sidestep local building regulations.

Rietveld Schröder House, first floor skylight and open plan living area
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor demonstration of sliding panels

This was necessary because the whole of the upper floor was an open plan space with no fixed walls that could be divided into separate rooms using sliding and revolving panels, or left open as a single large area. A central living room, originally boasting panoramic views (now somewhat obscured), featured built-in storage (including a striking yellow cupboard in the corner resembling a modernist sculpture), a skylight and the same three dimensional ceiling lamp as the one on the ground floor.

Rietveld Schröder House, first floor central living room
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor central living room with yellow cupboard unit

The daughter’s bedroom was designed to be multi-functional: a sitting room by day, and a bedroom for two by night. The son’s room was more experimental with a floor made from a patchwork of different colours and materials and detachable wall panels in lieu of curtains for privacy. An early version of a spotlight illuminated the room, showing Rietveld’s interest in modern lighting techniques.

Rietveld Schröder House, first floor daughter’s bedroom
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor son’s bedroom (with Rietveld’s Red and Blue chair)

The main bedroom, used by Schröder herself, was surprisingly the smallest in the house. Rietveld, however, used the space very efficiently, incorporating a built-in washbasin, a fold-out cupboard and a narrow red shelf just wide enough to hold a watch or small personal items.

Rietveld Schröder House, first floor bathroom and (small) main bedroom
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor stairway and concealed door to separate toilet

The bathroom was tucked between the mother’s and daughters’ rooms and featured a granite hip bath and a sliding vent hatch for fresh air—compact, yet luxurious for the time. The separate toilet was tucked away behind a black painted door.

Rietveld Schröder House, first floor open plan area
Rietveld Schröder House, staircase to first floor

Though the family was wealthy, the house was decidedly modest in size, built on a tight urban plot. The constraints caused by the small plot were part of the creative challenge for Rietveld, who embraced the opportunity to build something innovative without the luxury of unlimited space and scale.

Centraal Museum, Rietveld exhibit
Centraal Museum, Rietveld exhibit

Truus Schröder-Schräder lived in the house until her death in 1985. The house was then restored by Bertus Mulder and now is a museum open for visits, run by the Centraal Museum. It has been a listed monument since 1976 and UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2000. An exhibition on the house and Rietveld’s other designs form part of the permanent collection at the Centraal Musuem in central Utrecht.

Model of Rietveld Schröder House
Miniature models of chairs in Rietveld Schröder House

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, Syracuse

Although no one associates Sicily with modernist architecture, I visited the striking concrete Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime (Sanctuary of the Virgin of Tears) during a recent trip to Syracuse.

View of Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime from Greek Theatre of Syracuse

Designed by French architects Michel Andrault and Pierre Parat, the basilica was the winning entry in an international competition involving architects from 17 different countries. Construction began in 1966 but wasn’t completed until 1994 due to the building’s complex engineering, archaeological discoveries, funding issues, and controversy surrounding its bold modernist design.

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior views and details
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior

Though originally intended to be even taller, the structure still reached 103 metres, its reinforced concrete cone tapering sharply upward and crowned with a bronze statue of the Virgin by Francesco Caldarella. The result is compared to a teardrop falling from heaven or, less flatteringly, to an upside-down ice cream cone. Approaching the basilica, the first impression was one of scale. The exterior was monumental and unmistakably modern, its geometric form visible from almost anywhere in the city.

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior of one of the 16 chapels positioned around the perimeter
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior views and details
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, lower level

Inside, the space was vast yet calm. The interior was circular in plan, 71 metres in diameter and designed to hold up to 11,000 standing or 6,000 seated visitors. Sixteen chapels were positioned around the perimeter, while the central altar – crafted from white marble and local Modica stone by Giancarlo Marchese – held the image of the Madonna delle Lacrime alongside an 18th-century cross. The interior’s height and symmetry were softened by diffused natural light entering from above.

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, concrete rib ceiling
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior pews

The basilica’s striking ceiling featured a dramatic radial pattern of concrete ribs that rose and tapered toward the centre, drawing the eye upwards.

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior pews
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior details
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior

The design of the basilica was, and remains, controversial. Some see it as an eyesore, others as a daring and spiritually resonant work of modern architecture.

Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior

Modernist pilgrimage to Lisbon

Lisbon was not exactly brimming with modernist architecture but I did manage to seek out a church, a gallery and a public building that were of interest to me aesthetically.

Sagrado Coração Church

Fairly inconspicuous from the street, Sagrado Coração Church was tucked between residential buildings and offices with its entrance elevated above street level.

Sagrado Coração Church exterior from street level

The church and its accompanying annexes were designed and built by Nuno Teotónio Pereira and Nuno Portas between 1962 and 1970 on a small plot of land in central Lisbon.

Sagrado Coração Church, platform in front of church entrance
Sagrado Coração Church, exterior detail
Sagrado Coração Church, exterior detail

To optimise the small amount of space, the church and its annexes were distributed across a number of different levels united by a large uncovered public area connecting every entrance to the plot via different platforms.

Sagrado Coração Church, uncovered public area
Sagrado Coração Church, uncovered public area and seating
Sagrado Coração Church, uncovered public area

The interior of the church was similarly multi-levelled with the different sections spread across multiple levels linked by staircases and platforms. The layout encouraged movement compared to a standard single-storey church, almost as if it was designed for people to be part of the space rather than just sitting in it.

Sagrado Coração Church, interior
Sagrado Coração Church, interior detail
Sagrado Coração Church, interior

The design was dominated by concrete and glass with striking lines running across the ceiling in a geometric pattern. The interior space was designed in such a way to allow light to filter in at the right angles to cast soft shadows and play off the textures of the concrete, which contributed to a decidedly peaceful, reflective atmosphere.

Sagrado Coração Church, exterior detail from street
Sagrado Coração Church, church doors
Sagrado Coração Church, exterior detail

Artificial lighting by way of distinctive lantern-shaped lamps had been placed thoughtfully throughout the space to complement the natural light.

Sagrado Coração Church, interior

Gulbenkian Museum

The Gulbenkian Museum was part of a modernist complex in Lisbon, designed by Portuguese architects Ruy d’Athouguia, Alberto Pessoa, and Pedro Cid. Built in the late 1960s and opened in 1969, the museum was created specifically to display its collection, unlike many older museums that occupied repurposed buildings.

Gulbenkian Museum exterior

The design of the buildings reflected modernist principles, with low, horizontal structures made of concrete, stone and bronze-tinted glass. In 1975, the complex won the Valmor Prize for architecture, and in 2010, it was recognized as a National Monument—the first contemporary building in Portugal to receive this status.

The Main Museum Building

The main building museum was low and spread out, its concrete surfaces softened by the surrounding trees and water features.

Gulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance hall
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance exterior
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance hall

Inside, the use of wood, stone, and carpeting contrasted with the concrete exterior and large windows throughout the space framed views of the surrounding gardens and let natural light into the galleries.

Gulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery courtyard
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery space
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building seating area

The museum’s design used nature as the backdrop to both the artwork (mostly traditional in style) and architecture.

Gulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery space

The Foundation’s Headquarters

Adjacent to the museum were the headquarters of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters open plan area connecting concert halls
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters corridor and seating
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters open plan area connecting concert halls

This building shared the same modernist design as the main museum with a modular structure that emphasised clean lines and simple materials.

Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters concert hall lobby
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters concert hall lobby
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters

The layout consisted of large open plan areas connecting the concert halls, public spaces and administrative offices that made up the building. These vast carpeted areas were punctuated with attractive mid-century furniture, some of it built into the space.

Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters

The Gulbenkian Garden

The buildings were surrounded by the Gulbenkian Garden, a 7.5-hectare green space designed by landscape architects António Viana Barreto and Gonçalo Ribeiro Telles.

Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens
Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens
Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens

The garden was created in the late 1960s as part of the modernist movement in Portugal, using natural vegetation in a way that broke from traditional landscaping styles. It was designed to feel like a natural extension of the museum, with winding paths, open spaces, and water features that reflected the minimalist style of the buildings.

Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens

The CAM Building and Kengo Kuma’s Redesign

At the far end of the Gulbenkian garden was the CAM (Centro de Arte Moderna) building, originally designed by British architect Sir Leslie Martin and opened in 1983.

Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building exterior
Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building exterior and interior
Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building covered walkway

This building recently underwent an extensive redesign by Japanese architect Kengo Kuma, known for his work that merges architecture with nature. His new design featured a 100-metre-long canopy made of Portuguese ceramic tiles, inspired by the Japanese Engawa—a covered walkway that creates a transition between indoor and outdoor spaces. This space housed a collection of modern and contemporary Portuguese art.

Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna interior gallery space

Palace of Justice in Lisbon

The Palace of Justice was a striking brutalist building, designed by architects Januário Godinho and João Henrique de Breloes Andresen.

Palace of Justice exterior

Standing at the head of Parque Eduardo VII, a large green space in the center of Lisbon,it was built between 1962 and 1970 and serves as the city’s main court.

Palace of Justice exterior
Palace of Justice exterior detail
Palace of Justice exterior colonnades

The building was long and rectangular, with large concrete columns supporting its cantilevered facade on all sides. This design made it look as if it was slightly lifted off the ground, giving it an unexpected sense of lightness despite its monolithic size. The materials and structure were typical of brutalism – strong, geometric, and functional – but with a unique Portuguese touch. Instead of the raw, heavy concrete often seen in brutalist buildings, the facade here was decorated with geometric patterns and rhythmic textures. This detail softened the building’s appearance, reflecting Portugal’s penchant for a patterned tile. The interplay of light and shadow on the textured concrete created a dynamic effect which must change throughout the day.

Palace of Justice exterior
Palace of Justice exterior
Palace of Justice exterior

I wasn’t able to blag my way into the building, unfortunately, but was glad to visit its imposing facade in person.

Winscombe Street terrace, N19

The next property I visited as part of Open House 2024 was Winscombe Street, a small terrace of houses that was the first of three housing projects that Neave Brown built in the UK.

Winscombe Street terrace, front facade

Built on a site in 1965 over a former sewer, Winscombe Street terrace consisted of 5 three-storey identical houses and a studio. It struck me as a private and quite exclusive place to live – photography was not permitted on the Open House Tour (except for at the front of the houses) so I have used sales listings and architectural journals to illustrate what I saw inside and around the back.

Winscombe Street terrace, front staircases
Winscombe Street terrace, front facade details
Winscombe Street terrace, front facade

The tour started on the ground floor, which contained the kitchen/dining area and a bathroom, all in original condition.

Winscombe Street terrace, ground floor kitchen
Winscombe Street terrace, ground floor kitchen

In the hallway was a very distinctive wooden staircase consisting of steps cantlivered from a central pole which anchored down into the concrete on the lower ground floor. The staircase led upstairs to the top floor and downstairs to a lower ground floor.

Winscombe Street terrace, cantilevered staircase
Winscombe Street terrace, cantilevered staircase

The upstairs floor, which consisted of two large rooms divided by a sliding partition door, was used by the owner as a living room and the master bedroom. This floor was very bright owing to the domed skylight above the staircase. We were told that this floor gets a bit too warm in summer.

Winscombe Street terrace, upper floor living room
Winscombe Street terrace, upper floor living room
Winscombe Street terrace, upper floor bedroom

The lower ground floor consisted of a half bathroom (containing a Japanese sized bath), a bedroom, a utility room and a large flexible room containing sliding doors affixed on a system of rails and tracks. This could be arranged as two narrow bedrooms or one larger space. We were told that this downstairs space was often used by residents for children’s bedrooms or a granny annex as it was self contained (with its own entrance into the back garden) and separate from the rest of the house.

Winscombe Street terrace, lower ground floor flexible room
Winscombe Street terrace, lower ground floor flexible room

Outside was the communal garden, which was well maintained by the residents via a system of clearing days during the year. We were told that the residents abide by self-imposed rules not to play any music, hang washing or erect fences in the garden.

Winscombe Street terrace, rear garden
Winscombe Street terrace, rear garden
Winscombe Street terrace, rear garden

We were told that the residents of Winscombe Terrace are leaseholders but shareholders of a freehold company responsible for the overall maintenance of the terrace. The residents struck me as a close, quite exclusive community- we were told that prospective buyers need to submit an application to the existing residents and undergo an interview process with each existing resident granted the power of veto, which is reportedly exercised every so often if the prospective buyer is not deemed the right fit.

Winscombe Street terrace, rear garden

Lillington Gardens, London SW1V 

I visited Lillington Gardens, the Grade II listed modernist estate in Pimlico, for the first time as a part of Open House London in September 2024.

Lillington Gardens, view from inside estate

The estate was constructed in three phases between 1961 and 1971 and was designed by Darbourne (aged only 21 at the time) and Darke.

Lillington Gardens, view from inside estate
Lillington Gardens, views from inside estate
Lillington Gardens, communal gardens

The design was inspired by the Victorian red brick of the arts and crafts-style Grade I-listed Church of St James the Less, which is situated on the site. This was an unusual design choice in the 1960s – I don’t think I’ve ever seen another completely red brick modernist estate before.

Lillington Gardens, plate glass windows
Lillington Gardens, views inside estate including later phase clad in grey slate
Lillington Gardens, communal gardens

Consisting of 1,000 homes, the intention behind the design of the estate was to provide high density housing without any high rise blocks. The plan of the estate consisted of clusters of blocks no taller than 8 storeys connected by internal courtyards and cross-wings threaded through with paths and ramps with the higher levels accessible by brick-paved internal streets.

Lillington Gardens, view from street
Lillington Gardens, views from inside estate
Lillington Gardens, plate glass windows

We were led around the estate as part of the Open House tour, starting from the community centre in the middle of the estate and around the extensive communal grounds, which included a basketball court, on multiple levels.

Lillington Gardens, view from inside estate
Lillington Gardens, communal basketball court
Lillington Gardens, communal gardens

We were not shown inside any of the apartments but were told that they ranged from studios to much larger four bedroom homes clustered in groups of three with interlocking “scissor” floor plans. I found some interior shots via old estate agent listings for a studio and a three-bedroom split level apartment, which give an idea of the size and shape of the homes.

Lillington Gardens, hallway of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, living room and kitchen of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, living room (opening into bedroom) of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)

The apartments were designed to have aesthetically pleasing views – Darbourne and Darke wanted residents to have views over the communal gardens wherever they were in the estate and installed large plate glass windows in the apartments to give them panoramic views.

Lillington Gardens, balcony of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, living room of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, balcony of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)

Unfortunately, the apartments built in the third phase later on in the project (grey slate cladding) had much smaller windows, potentially a cost saving measure.

Lillington Gardens, study of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, bedrooms of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)
Lillington Gardens, study of three-bedroom flat (The Modern House)

Residents reported that the estate was a well designed, pleasant, quiet place to live in a fantastic location. However, residents also mentioned the various issues that have plagued the estate (and have been reported on extensively) in recent times.

Lillington Gardens, interior of studio flat (Stirling Ackroyd)
Lillington Gardens, interior of studio flat (Stirling Ackroyd)
Lillington Gardens, exterior of studio flat (Stirling Ackroyd)