This beautiful house occasionally pops up during Open House weekend for tours but tickets are usually snapped up in seconds. I managed to get in via an alternative route: a paid-for tour via C20 and it was well worth the price of entry.
Pine Heath, view of terrace from rear communal garden
Just west of Hampstead Heath, within the Hampstead Conservation Area, Pine Heath had originally been a nursery garden until 1967, after which twelve modernist houses were built around a communal green.
Pine Heath, view of terrace from frontPine Heath, views of terrace from frontPine Heath, view of terrace from rear communal garden
Work began on Pine Heath in 1968 and finished in 1970. Designed by Ted Levy, Benjamin & Partners, the houses were arranged not squarely to the street but subtly shifted off the perpendicular, allowing southerly light to filter into the long, narrow plots. Each terrace was designed to feel private rather than repetitively lined up with the shift in axis creating oblique views and protecting sightlines. The architecture combined concrete and brick in a hybrid construction with raking pitched roofs and double-height spaces. Five principal townhouses were mirrored on the corner, accompanied by a band of studio flats.
Pine Heath, view of terrace from road behind communal gardenPine Heath, views of terrace from rear communal gardenPine Heath,rear communal gardenPine Heath, view of terrace from rear communal garden
Although Pine Heath sits within a conservation area, the houses were not listed (none of Levy’s work was) partly because of later alterations and partly because architecture of the late 1960s and early 1970s had often slipped through the net of heritage recognition. In practice, however, a vigilant “council of elders” among the residents ensured that no one makes drastic external changes.
Pine Heath, view of terrace from rear communal gardenPine Heath, rear gardenPine Heath, rear garden
The house I visited had been occupied by its previous owner since 1970 and had been renovated by the new owners and architect firm Studio Hagen Hall. When the new owners first approached the architects, the brief had been for a light upgrade but the project quickly evolved into a comprehensive refurbishment: reconfiguring layouts, crafting bespoke joinery, upgrading the building envelope, and implementing a renewable energy strategy.
Entrance and Ground Floor
Compared to the rear of the estate, where you could see the pattern of the slightly staggered townhouses clearly, the front of the terrace was unassuming.
Pine Heath, ground and first floor
The main entrance opened onto the ground floor principal living zone of the house. The house had originally been arranged as a series of smaller rooms rather than open plan and although Studio Hagen Hall hadn’t fully reconfigured the layout, it had improved sightlines, making it possible to see through most of the house.
Pine Heath, ground and first floorPine Heath, ceiling and wall paneling detailPine Heath, ground floorPine Heath, ground floordetail
The kitchen to the right of the entrance had been reworked but tastefully and sensitively. The vertical line of the original window mullions had been mirrored in a line running around the top of the kitchen joinery and a sweeping timber curve served to soften the geometry and the former 1960s serving hatch had been enlarged rather than removed entirely, acknowledging the original layout.
Pine Heath, kitchenPine Heath, kitchendetailPine Heath, kitchen
Further into the house was the living area, a sunken, carpeted seating zone which had the feel of a conversation pit. An angled built-in sofa ran around a bespoke coffee table had been designed to offset the geometry of the sofa.
Pine Heath, living area built-in sofaPine Heath, ground floor living area detailPine Heath, ground floor living area built in sound systemPine Heath, ground floor living area built-in furniture
The architects had gained additional ceiling height below by raising sections of the floor, subtly zoning the space without losing continuity. Flooring extended seamlessly out to the terrace patio, which backed onto a communal garden.
Pine Heath, rear gardenPine Heath, wall unit and rear gardenPine Heath, rear garden
Basement Level
The basement level was accessed by a staircase leading down from the living room area (Studio Hagen had removed the original door blocking this off) and functioned almost as a self-contained suite, with its own exit directly to the street. The rooms (a living space/gym, bathroom and utility room) were all timber lined to match the original piranha pine – a rare South American timber now endangered – that had been preserved upstairs.
Pine Heath, basement levelPine Heath, basement levelPine Heath, basement level bathroom and utilityPine Heath, basement level bathroom
First and Second Floors
The house was larger than it appeared from the outside, unfolding vertically across five stepped levels, each slightly offset from the next. On the first floor was a sitting room which looked down onto the dining area below.
Pine Heath, first floor living areaPine Heath, first floor living areaPine Heath, first floor living areaPine Heath, view of ground floor dining area from first floor
Bedrooms occupied the second and third floors, each accompanied by its own bathroom (each with a distinct tile choice), an unusually generous provision for a British modernist house of the period. Though the original layout had been for three bedrooms, the refurbishment had converted it into a four-bedroom setup.
Vacuum glazing replaced the original windows, maintaining the pattern and proportions of Levy’s design while improving thermal performance.
Pine Heath, master bedroomPine Heath, second bedroomPine Heath, master bathroomdetail
Top Floor
At the top of the house was a study/spare room with a built-in daybed tucked into the raking roof. The space felt almost nautical, ship-like in its proportions, with the angled ceiling pressing gently downward. This room was accompanied by a paved roof terrace overlooking the communal garden.
Pine Heath, top floor studyPine Heath, top floor hallway and studyPine Heath, top floor terracePine Heath, top floor terrace
Photos published by Studio Hagen Hall showed the house in the original form alongside its current modernised state.
Pine Heath, before and aftersPine Heath, before and aftersPine Heath, before and afters
I was fortunate enough during last year’s Open House festival to attend a tour of The Stanley Picker House, a mid century modern marvel on a substantial private estate in Kingston upon Thames, Surrey.
Stanley Picker House, view of house from front garden
Commissioned in 1965 by Stanley Picker, a successful entrepreneur whose ventures in plastics and cosmetics had brought him considerable wealth, the house was designed and completed by architect Kenneth Wood (who had trained with Span) in 1968 as a dedicated home to showcase Picker’s art collection.
Stanley Picker House, view of house from rear gardenStanley Picker House, view of waterfall and house from rear gardenStanley Picker House, view of house from rear garden
In 1976, Picker established a trust to conserve the house and its contents in perpetuity. Remarkably, the home has remained virtually untouched since its completion, with no additions and all of the original furniture intact. The preservation of the house has been aided by live-in caretakers and the trust’s policy of only allowing a maximum of 30 visitors to enter the house each year to preserve the integrity of both the structure and its artworks.
Stanley Picker House, view of house from rear garden(image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, view of caretaker’s wing and house from rear gardenStanley Picker House, view of waterfall from rear garden
Photography of the interiors was also strictly prohibited. From the time that Picker lived in the house, he was fiercely protective over his privacy and his art collection, even going as far to stop Conran, who designed most of the furniture in the house, to use images of the house to promote his practice. The trust has therefore continued in this tradition – it is very difficult to find interior shots of the house online (the ones that I did manage to find are in this blog entry) and any photos that you do see do not focus on the artwork, particularly the paintings.
Exterior
The house was built on a challenging, steep plot dotted with oak trees, providing natural framing for the building. From the outside, the front elevation of the house was unassuming and did not prepare me for the striking interior space and gardens that lay behind the main entrance.
Stanley Picker House, front gardenStanley Picker House, exterior detailStanley Picker House, view of house from rear garden
The façade of the house and its inwards-facing layout was deliberately designed to be discreet, reflecting the social pressures of the time: Picker and his partner Paul Cavanagh had to maintain privacy in an era when homosexuality, though partially decriminalised in 1967, remained stigmatised.
Entrance
Stepping inside into the entrance hall, the hallway featured stained-glass windows crafted in the Daldevere technique, slabs set into resin within metal frames. Here, as throughout the house, the architecture was designed with specific artworks in mind: Terry Frost paintings and a Paul Mount sculpture mirrored the geometry and light of the vestibule while pieces by Dennis Mitchell, a studio assistant of Barbara Hepworth, sat alongside works by more established artists.
Stanley Picker House, entrance hall detail (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, entrance hall detail (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, entrance hall detail (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023)
Upper level
Beyond the entrance hall was an upper landing area with a stunning elevated perspective over the double-height living area below. A large, striking painting of Christopher Gibb by Patrick Proctor, an artist unfavorably compared to David Hockney at the time, overlooked the galleried area. The landing area was widened at Picker’s request to fit walnut piano from his previous house as the piano was said to work best up here acoustically.
Stanley Picker House, upper landing and painting of Christopher Gibb by Patrick Proctor (photograph by Lewis Ronald)Stanley Picker House, view of living area from upper landing (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023)
Also on the upper level was the library, featuring chocolate-brown hessian walls and a bespoke tropical laurel sideboard with a drop-leaf bureau and an integrated reel-to-reel tape deck, the best technology that could be bought at the time. The mid century modern furniture in the library and the rest of the house was selected by Terence Conran and represented the first domestic project by Conran Group, coinciding with introduction of the Habitat brand to the UK market and providing a testing ground for Habitat products. The mix of bespoke pieces by Conran, reissues of 1920s pieces and contemporary 1960s pieces were reportedly not to Picker’s taste as he preferred a chintzier style. In fact, anything that Conran didn’t select in the house (i.e. most of the art and knickknacks) were kind of chintzy – I wondered why someone with such chintzy taste would want such a cutting edge modernist home and was told that Picker had multiple other, more traditional homes and this one was built as something of a status symbol.
Stanley Picker House, landing (image copyright Bridget Smith 2012 – The Landing from The Picker House) Stanley Picker House – dining room (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023), upstairs library and view of living room from upper landing (Image Copyright: The Stanley Picker Trust)
Living Spaces
Descending the stairs brought you into the main living room. Orange velour Conran sofas anchored the space, paired with theatre-style Castiglioni lamps and a large coffee table with fold-down panels. An enormous sliding-door entertainment unit housed a 4-channel stereo and portable 8-track player on which Picker played classical music and contemporary musical theatre scores.
Stanley Picker House, living room (photograph from front cover of The Picker House and Collection)Stanley Picker House, chandelier detail (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, multimedia unit (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, audio station (photograph by Lewis Ronald, image sourced from @analoguefoundation on Instagram)
The adjacent dining room served as an entertaining space for regular dinner parties, with guests including Danny La Rue and Lionel Blair. This space featured pendant lighting and reupholstered emerald green Mies van der Rohe chairs, tying the room’s rug and accessories together. Original glassware, linens, and ceramics were stored neatly in bespoke cupboards adorned with lithographs by Chagall, a nod to Picker’s Belarusian heritage.
Stanley Picker House, view of both floors (photographs by Lewis Ronald, image sourced from plastiques.art)Stanley Picker House, dining room detail (image copyright Jim Stephenson 2023) Stanley Picker House, sculpture and curtain detail (left image copyright Jim Stephenson and right image sourced from @salads.architects on Instagram)
Bedrooms and Private Spaces
The house accommodated two parallel sets of inhabitants: Picker and Cavanagh (who had been together for many years before moving into this house and lived here until they both died), and the family who looked after the house in the caretaker’s wing. Cavanagh’s bedroom, concealed behind a hidden door off the dining room to maintain privacy, was more functional than decorative, overlooking the garden without granting access. Due to the social attitudes of the time, the couple had to maintain pretence that Cavanagh was a lodger.
Stanley Picker House, dressing room (image copyright Bridget Smith 2012 – The Dressing Room from The Picker House) Stanley Picker House, guest bedroom (image copyright Bridget Smith 2012 – The Guest Bedroom from The Picker House)
Picker’s own suite of rooms was more extravagant and consisted of a bedroom, bathroom and dressing room. The bedroom felt as if it was enveloped by the lush gardens with its dual-aspect windows, complemented by warm wood tones and a soft yellow and green colour scheme. The carpet in the adjoining dressing room was slightly sunken in to be flush with wooden floor of bedroom.
Stanley Picker House, master bedroom (image copyright Bridget Smith 2012 – The Master Bedroom from The Picker House) Stanley Picker House, view of master bedroom from garden
There was also a spare bedroom on the upper floor (in relation to which I could not find any images online!) which showcased a slightly bolder use of color: rose-colored walls, bright corduroy blue carpets and Habitat curtains. The Conran group also provided the bed linens, a Formica vanity unit and Marcel Breuer and Saarinen tables bought for purposes of putting art on them. Another Patrick Proctor painting of Ossie Clark and Christopher Gibb alongside Mt Fuji hung by above the bed.
Stanley Picker House, view of house from rear garden
Garden and gallery
The house opened onto a carefully designed garden, conceived in collaboration with landscape gardeners and Picker’s architectural team. While access from the main house was limited, the view through expansive glazing and sliding doors reinforced the house’s inward focus, bringing the natural beauty of the surroundings into the house.
A standalone gallery building was added in 1976 at Wood’s suggestion because the house was becoming too cluttered by Picker’s dense art collection. Here, Elizabeth Frink sculptures and a Rodin piece were displayed alongside modern paintings, reflecting Picker’s desire to juxtapose the famous and the unknown while avoiding pop art trends.
Stanley Picker House, Picker House entrance court c.1968 (credit Kenneth Wood archive) Stanley Picker House, view from living area to entrance gallery c.1968, photographed by Colin Westwood courtesy of Stanley Picker House and floorplan of lower floorStanley Picker House, view of the garden looking towards the terrace with one of Picker’s Labradors, early 1970s (courtesy of Kenneth Wood, sourced from @stellabottai on Instagram)
Photo sources for images of interior of Stanley Picker House:
Looking at the stats for this blog, my most viewed post every year is usually the round-up of mid century shelving systems that I compiled all the way back in 2017 so for my first post of 2026, I thought I’d do an update.
Almost 10 years on, I’m still very fond of mid century-inspired wall-mounted shelving systems and the Poul Cadovius royal system that I inherited from my father still has pride of place on the wall of our living room.
Poul Cadovius Royal System in Great Brownings living room
In terms of what else is available on the market, all of the design classics that I covered in 2017 are still available but some of the high street offerings have been discontinued or replaced.
Here are my picks (with an option for every price point):
1. dk3 Royal System (£££)
While I prefer the original, chunkier version of the Cado royal system, I think that the modern slimline version reissued by dk3 still looks great and looks more contemporary. It comes in oak and walnut.
dk3 Royal System dk3 Royal System detaildk3 Royal System
2. Vitsoe 606 system (£££)
These are a tad officey-looking but I’ve seen them in various high-end homes and they always look great. For me, the best use of Vitsoe shelving is as a room divider as per this studio flat in the Barbican.
Vitsoe 606 system – wall configurationVitsoe 606 system – different wall configurationsVitsoe 606 system – wall configuration
3. String shelving system (££)
Although it’s still ubiquitous and a Scandi cliche these days, I still think String shelving elevates any room. Having put String shelving up in most rooms of our house (kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms), I would say it looks great but it’s a little flimsy – I don’t think I would rely on the wall-mounted version to bear the weight of anything heavier than a few ornaments, paperback books and toiletries.
String shelving white wall configurationString shelving walnut and white configurations (with desk)String shelving low white wall configuration
4. Hay Pier System (££)
Hay’s streamlined, minimalistic version of a modular shelving system on rails is made out of lightweight aluminium and steel and is available in a variety of colours and set configurations that can be combined with each other.
Hay Pier System black wall configuration Hay Pier System white wall configurationHay Pier System white wall configurationdetail
5. On-Wall office shelving (££)
The On-Wall modular shelving system consists of steel wall uprights, plate-like brackets and lightweight shelf boards. Again, it looks a little corporate but when used in a domestic setting, it resembles the more expensive Vitsoe system, especially the drawer units.
On Wall white wall configurationOn Wall white wall configurationdetailOn Wall white wall configuration
6. La RedouteArchivita set (££)
The Architvita shelving system looks like an updated version of the Taktik system that I featured in my post from 2017 – it seems to feature the similar vertical metal rails as before (though La Redoute has stressed that the two systems are not compatible) but the shelves and cabinetry have been updated and refined.
IKEA has discontinued its Svalnas wooden wall mounted shelving system but those who want to install something modular on a budget can look to Boaxel, its flexible, wall-mounted storage solution, most commonly used in closets, bedrooms, and utility areas. I’m not sure about the version with oak veneer shelves but I love how the white version looks in the living room examples pictured here – it’s pretty similar to the more expensive examples in this list.
IKEA shelving system with white shelvesIKEA shelving system with oak veneer shelvesIKEA shelving system examples – detail
During a recent trip to Stockholm (which unlike neighbouring capitals Oslo, Helsinki and Copenhagen seemed to have a dearth of mid century/modernist attractions), I decided to make the long journey north to visit Lilla Hyttnäs, a late 1800s cottage and the home of Carl and Karin Larsson, in the tiny village of Sundborn outside Falun in Dalarna.
Carl Larsson house, main entrance
While the cottage predates the mid-century modern period that I usually focus on by over half a century, the Larssons pioneered a distinctly Scandinavian approach to domestic design (light, colour, craft and simplicity) that shaped the sensibilities later associated with Nordic modernism and the interiors (bold, bright and strikingly modern-looking for their time) became the blueprint for a whole national aesthetic. IKEA reportedly makes regular pilgrimages to the cottage: a busload of designers visits annually, mining ideas for future products and the Larssons’ influence on IKEA’s aesthetic and product line is unmistakable.
Carl Larsson house, house exterior from gardenCarl Larsson house, house exterior Carl Larsson house, house exterior from garden
Our trip to the village and the cottage felt faintly folkloric: a three hour train journey to Falun, followed by an infrequent rural bus or a prohibitively expensive taxi to Sundborn (I chose the latter: £45 for a fifteen-minute drive) but all of this added to the sense of pilgrimage.
Carl Larsson house, Sundborn villageCarl Larsson house, Sundborn villageCarl Larsson house, view of river from garden
The village of Sundborn consisted of a scatter of deep Falu-red wooden houses along the Sundborn river with the Larssons’ home as its centrepiece. On the freezing November day that we visited, both the village and the grounds of the property were deserted and we were met by a single, very knowledgeable guide who took us on a private tour of the cottage (private because we seemed to be the only visitors to the village that day). Unfortunately, photography was not allowed inside as the cottage is still owned and very much used as a home by members of the Larsson family (small signs of life could be seen amidst the preserved, museum-like rooms) but I managed to find a lot of photos of the interiors online to accompany this entry.
Carl Larsson, born in 1853 into poverty, was lifted out of hardship by teachers who recognised his talent and helped him into the Royal Swedish Academy of Art. He worked in Stockholm, struggled, moved to Paris, struggled even more, and eventually found his footing in a rural artists’ colony outside the city. The light, the water, and the community suited him.
Carl Larsson house, exterior Carl Larsson house, exterior detailCarl Larsson house, view of river from garden
Meanwhile Karin Bergöö, born into a more prosperous family, trained at the Art Academy in Stockholm. She and Carl met in France, married, and eventually returned to Sweden. Karin’s father gifted them Lilla Hyttnäs in 1888: at that time a tiny cottage of four rooms and a kitchen.
Carl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn villageCarl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn villageCarl Larsson house, surrounding houses in Sundborn village
What followed was a slow transformation, with extensions added between 1888 and 1912. By the time that the Larssons had settled permanently in 1900, the house had grown to about thirteen rooms, each with its own character and shaped by the interplay of Carl’s painting and Karin’s revolutionary approach to textiles, colour, and furniture design.
Carl Larsson house, garden (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, views of river from garden of houseCarl Larsson house, exterior of house from garden
We began in what had effectively been the family studio-workroom. This was where Carl painted and where Karin wove textiles on her loom – the guide pointed out a folksy cushion decorated in a very contemporary looking hearts and tears motif (symbols of hope and devotion) that a designer like Donna Wilson might make nowadays.
Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom detail (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, studio/workroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Next door was the dining room, which occupied one of the oldest parts of the house, the original cottage from the early 19th century. This space was dark and richly coloured in deep reds and greens. Meals were eaten in this room at a long table with a family-tree tablecloth designed by Karin under curling red lampshades designed by Carl. A heavily decorated cupboard known jokingly as the “cupboard of sins” (which concealed the kitchen door) stored liquid tobacco and various illicit “medicinal” alcohols.
Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, dining room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Adjoining the dining room was perhaps the most famous room in the house given that it was depicted in 24 of Carl’s paintings, including the iconic Flower Window from 1894. The living room was a warm, lived-in space with a tiled stove in the corner (above which, flowers climbing up to the ceiling had been painted) and windows overlooking the Sundborn river. The white wooden furniture and balustrades and pale blue and white textiles looked familiar, partly because IKEA’s design language is so saturated with echoes of it.
Carl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Girl Watering Flowers On Windowsill, Carl LarssonCarl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Cosy Corner by Carl LarssonCarl Larsson house, living room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Upstairs were a number of guest rooms and bedrooms which seemed to run into and connect with one another in a warren-like manner.
Carl Larsson house, staircase (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, upstairs library (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, library room tablecloth detail (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )
A wood paneled guest room, added in 1901, was furnished with a vast floor-to-ceiling carved cupboard from a German church. A traditional Swedish box-bed sat against the wall – short, enclosed, and designed for sleeping propped upright rather than lying flat. A commode hidden under a woven cushion in the corner reminded me that this was a 19th century house though the family have reportedly added a modern bathroom to the private quarters of the building.
Carl Larsson house, guest room (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, guest room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, washroom and children’s room (photos by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
The family slept in two adjoining bedrooms. Karin and the younger children used a bright, white-walled nursery-like room with green painted ceilings which featured yet more familiar looking pieces (IKEA has replicated the sleigh-style bed and the iron chandelier from this room).
Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s room (photo by TRONS/TT for unt.se )Carl Larsson house, Karin and children’s bedroom – Rose of Love curtain (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
This room was separated by a curtain embroidered with a Rose of Love motif from Carl’s bedroom, which featured a single bed placed in the centre of the room, surrounded by textiles like a four-poster tent, with windows, cupboards, and doors lining the walls of the room. Unusually, there was a small interior window in that looked down to the studio-workshop so Carl could view his paintings from a distance.
Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, Carl’s bedroom (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)
Back downstairs, a long corridor displaying works by artist friends, led to a large, dramatic studio space, built in 1889. Carl erected an internal wall to ensure the light entered only from the south, the way he preferred. A modern-looking rocking chair designed by Karin and since reproduced by IKEA (and I’m sure I’ve owned one from Habitat that looked like it) sat by the window. A tiny staircase (so narrow and steep that you’d never design one like it today) led from the studio up to additional bedrooms, another quirk that again reminded me that for all its modernity, Lilla Hyttnäs was still a 19th-century cottage at heart.
Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)Carl Larsson house, studio space (photos by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg and Carl Larsson website)Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Per Myrehed for Carl Larsson website)
The last addition, completed in 1910, was a small cottage attached to the house used variously as a guest room and Carl’s writing room. The final sentence he ever wrote before he died of a stroke in 1919 was preserved on the desk.
Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)Carl Larsson house, studio space (photo by Mikael Olsson for Magniberg)Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)Carl Larsson house, guest and writing room (photo by Mikael Olsson for NY Times)
Karin lived until 1928, spending summers at Sundborn until she moved to be closer to her children. In the 1930s, the Larsson children decided to preserve the house as a museum, while still using it as a holiday home. It remains hugely popular in the summer months, a living monument to the style their parents helped to create.
Carl Larsson house, main entrance of house
Stockholm round-up
As well as visiting the Larsson house, I visited another few places of tangential interest to this blog (as I mentioned above, Stockholm is not really a mid century/modernist city).
View from roof of Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum
Millesgården, on the island of Lidingö, turned out to be far more expansive and stranger than I expected. The site was really three places in one: the modernist museum building, which during my visit hosted a beautifully curated Alvar and Aino Aalto exhibition; the original artist’s house, gingerbread-trimmed and storybook-like on the outside but surprisingly grand and palazzo-esque inside; and, tucked a little to the side, the 1950s cottage built for the artist’s secretary, perfectly preserved and quietly tasteful in that now-familiar Scandinavian style.
Millesgården modernist museum building and Alvar and Aino Aalto exhibitionMillesgården museum terraceMillesgården 1950s cottage built for the artist’s secretary
All of this was layered across terraced sculpture gardens overlooking the water, with Carl Milles’ dramatic bronzes scattered across the hillside, giving the whole place a slightly otherworldly but alluring atmosphere – somewhere between a Mediterranean villa, an artist’s fantasy garden, and a piece of mid-century time travel.
Millesgårdenmuseum artist’s houseMillesgårdenmuseum terrace sculpturesMillesgårdenmuseum artist’s house
Even stranger, in a compelling, slightly uncanny way, was Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, a golden metal-clad building in Vasaparken that hid a full-scale replica of a floor of Sven-Harry’s own 1920s house on the roof. Walking through this simulated house complete with what looked like a working kitchen and a fake crackling fireplace, suspended above the city, felt more like stepping onto a film set or a dream reconstruction than visiting a museum. Everything was immaculate (and the domestic setting provided an unusual and unique way to display Sven-Harry’s impressive art collection) but off-kilter.
Sven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house exteriorSven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house hallwaySven-Harry’s Konstmuseum, replica of Sven Harry’s house interior
And finally, for shopping, I went across town to Ryttargatan Vintage, a sort of indoor flea market open only on weekends from 11 to 3. Compared to almost everything else in Stockholm, the prices felt improbably low. The place sold a large range of Swedish glassware, pottery, textiles, paintings, homewares and clothing.
Ryttargatan Vintage
Photo sources for images of interior of Carl Larsson house:
If we were ever to move on from Great Brownings, it would likely be to Woodhall Drive, another Austin Vernon and Partners estate just down the road. I’ve admired it for some time and sometimes cycle through it – I suspect that this isn’t especially appreciated by its residents – just to admire how the American-style suburbia of it all.
Woodhall Drive, estate exterior
Built between 1959 and 1966 by Austin Vernon and Partners for the Dulwich Estate, Woodhall Drive was conceived as a kind of architectural experiment – a low-density, American-inspired enclave of ranch-style houses, arranged around winding unadopted roads and open lawns.
The 42 houses were individually designed (most by Victor Knight with later contributions from Manfred Bresgen, and executed by Wates) and the development won the Ministry of Housing Award for Good Design in 1967, praised for its sensitivity to the sloping site, its long low rooflines and restrained use of materials – grey slate, brick, and painted boarding.
Woodhall Drive, estate exteriorWoodhall Drive, examples of different house types on estate (photos from Rightmove)Woodhall Drive, one of the rolling lawns
More than half a century later, the landscaping by Derek Lovejoy & Associates, which features rolling lawns merging into one another and trees framing each house, remains pretty much intact. The same can’t be said for a lot of the houses, however – it seems that the Dulwich Estate has been quite relaxed about allowing extensions and alterations on the estate and quite a few owners have turned their houses into sleek, glassy mansions. Still, enough of the original architecture survives for the estate’s character to be felt.
Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photo from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photos from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, example of Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
As far as I’m aware, there were around five different types of house on the estate of varying sizes and with range of different floorplans.
Woodhall Drive, split-level living room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, rooms in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, hallway in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
My favourite of the house types that I’ve seen (Type A, an example of which is pictured in these photos of a house previously listed by The Modern House) has a double height staircase and a split level living room with a chunky brick fireplace that acts a room divider between living and dining rooms.
Woodhall Drive, split-level living room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, hallway in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)Woodhall Drive, split-level dining room in Type A house (photo from The Modern House)
I had the opportunity to look around one of the other house types on the estate earlier this year. This was one of the smaller type D houses (at least I think so, based on the limited amount of information about Woodhall Drive available online) and in relatively unaltered condition. The asking price reflected this: fair, and a bit lower than all of the figures I’ve seen other houses on the estate go for in the past.
Woodhall Drive, Type D housefaçadeWoodhall Drive, Type D houseside elevationWoodhall Drive, Type D housefaçade
I thought that the front of the house was attractive on first impressions: the façade featured a mix of brick and timber cladding, a low-pitched gable roof, narrow clerestory windows and an integrated double garage. The garden, which wrapped around the house, was beautifully kept but almost too large for someone with my level of gardening ability.
Woodhall Drive, Type D housewraparound gardenWoodhall Drive, Type D housewraparound gardenWoodhall Drive, Type D housewraparound garden
Inside, a central hallway with an open-tread staircase (though not the dramatic double-height kind found in some of the other house types pictured above) led to the kitchen, dining room and living room on one side of the house and study, bathroom/utility and garage on the other.
Woodhall Drive, Type D houseporchWoodhall Drive, Type D househallwayWoodhall Drive, Type D housecorridor
The living room was bright and well-proportioned with direct access to the garden and the separate dining room, probably my favourite room in this house, was light-filled and overlooked the garden – I would have asked the sellers to include the mid century furniture in this room as part of the sale.
Woodhall Drive, Type D houseliving roomWoodhall Drive, Type D housedining roomWoodhall Drive, Type D houseliving and dining rooms
Upstairs, a long corridor ran the length of the house, connecting two large double bedrooms (the master bedroom was an extremely large sea of green with an ensuite) at either end, with two smaller single rooms and a family bathroom between them.
Woodhall Drive, Type D houseupstairs hallwayWoodhall Drive, Type D housemaster bedroomWoodhall Drive, Type D houseview of garden from master bedroom
Walking through the house and garden, I was struck by its potential and so was someone else as it sold quickly after my viewing.
Having visited the Rietveld Schröder and Van Ravestyn houses in Utrecht, we moved on to Amsterdam.
Western Garden Cities
A short tram ride west from the centre of the city was Westelijke Tuinsteden (the Western Garden Cities), an ambitious post-war housing development that was as much an open-air museum as it was a living neighbourhood – I’d never seen anything quite like it.
Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing
Planned in 1935 by urbanist Cornelis van Eesteren under the General Extension Plan, the Garden Cities were built to answer Amsterdam’s chronic housing shortage and shaped around the principles of light, air and space, conveying the optimism of a post-war generation that believed good housing could transform not only a city, but the people who lived within it.
Western Garden Cities, zebra crossingWestern Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, river running through suburb
Laid out on a generous scale with broad avenues, landscaped courtyards and housing blocks carefully positioned to catch the sun, the district became home to around 100,000 residents in the 1950s and 60s. A river ran through the suburb, threading water and greenery through the urban space.
Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing
The architecture was varied and experimental while still maintaining a cohesive style overall. Slab blocks and duplex houses stood beside bold public buildings including a 1950s H-shaped school and a striking brutalist yellow-trimmed building.
Western Garden Cities, brutalist public buildingWestern Garden Cities, brutalist public buildingWestern Garden Cities, relief on side of public building
A tour conducted entirely in Dutch (I had no idea what was going on at the time) took us around the neighbourhood, which looked well cared for with well maintained gardens and all facades intact.
Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing Western Garden Cities, housing
A restored flat maintained by the Van Eesteren Museum apartment on Freek Oxstraat showed how the principles of the Garden Cities extended to interior domestic spaces.
Western Garden Cities, view of Van Eesteren MuseumWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentexterior and communal areasWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentexterior
The apartment, a modest 40-square-metre duplex, was arranged on two levels, with the entrance on the upper floor.
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving roomWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving roomWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving room
This opened onto a living room with wide window, a compact but modern kitchen (for the time) and a separate dining room – a distinction unusual in Dutch working-class housing at the time, where families had often eaten and lived in the same cramped space.
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren MuseumapartmentkitchenWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren MuseumapartmentkitchenWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentseparate dining room
A staircase led down to the apartment’s more private quarters: a handful of bedrooms and a bathroom, modest in size but laid out with efficiency.
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren MuseumapartmentbedroomWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumbathroom, stairs and bedroomWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentbedroom
The design and decor of the apartment reflected the principles of Stichting Goed Wonen (the Association for Good Living), a foundation created after the Second World War by designers, architects and shopkeepers determined to teach people how to live well in their new homes.
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving roomdetailWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving roomdetailWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentliving roomdetail
Replacing the dark, heavy interiors of pre-war slum housing consisting of rooms crammed with carved wardrobes, velvet curtains and knick-knacks, the Stichting Goed Wonen aesthetic involved easy to clean bare lino floors, simple furniture (many designed by Premsela) lightweight enough to fold and move, built-in cupboards to keep clutter hidden and large windows to let daylight in.
Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentdining room detailWestern Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentdining room Western Garden Cities, Van Eesteren Museumapartmentdining room detail
Every element was chosen to be functional, hygienic and modern and it was believed that this would nurture healthier, more forward-looking citizens. By the 1960s, these ideals had become fashionable, influencing not only housing but wider lifestyle and culture. The Goed Wonen philosophy even helped inspire the DNA of IKEA, with its emphasis on affordable, adaptable furnishings for the “common man.”
Western Garden Cities, by the riverWestern Garden Cities, by the riverWestern Garden Cities, by the river
Tucked into a small triangular plot a few minutes down the down fromthe Rietveld Schröder House was the intriguing Sybold van Ravesteyn house. Built out of sand-coloured railway bricks between 1932 and 1934 by Sybold van Ravestyn (an eccentric architect best known for designing train stations for the Dutch Railways), the house challenged architectural conventions of the time.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, exterior
The plot – little more than a wedge-shaped leftover at the bend of a street – was just about big enough to fit the house, which consisted of a rectangular two-storey building with a semicircular volume and roof terrace on the first floor. A narrow garage – almost comically tight – was appended to the left side of the property, designed to form part of the overall silhouette of the house.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, exteriorSybold van Ravesteyn House, narrow garage and exterior detailSybold van Ravesteyn House, front garden
Inside, Van Ravesteyn maximised use of the small footprint by using narrow, steep stairs and installing curved walls to soften corners and guide movement around the house.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, hallway and staircaseSybold van Ravesteyn House, staircaseSybold van Ravesteyn House, hallway and staircase
The central part of the house was a large open plan living space with no dividing walls between the study, sitting room and dining room – an unusual concept at the time and one of the first examples of modern open plan living in the Netherlands.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– sitting areaSybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room – dining areaSybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– study area
This large open-plan space featured curved lines in the floor, a suspended ceiling of frosted glass in a steel frame and built-in furniture, which served to subtly zone the space into sitting, dining and working areas.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– built-in furnitureSybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– detailSybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– suspended frosted glass ceiling
Though the house was practical in many ways (unusually for domestic buildings at the time, it had both central heating and plumbing throughout the house and a kitchen equipped with modern domestic appliances), Van Ravestyn resisted the cold minimalism often associated with early modernism, filling it with porcelain figurines, neo-Baroque decorative lines carved into the ceilings and built-in shelves that drew the eye across the room, their lines continuing into baseboards and shutter grooves.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– detailSybold van Ravesteyn House, kitchenSybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room– built-in cupboards and furniture
Upstairs were three bedrooms and a bathroom. Van Ravestyn decided against installing traditional box beds in the bedrooms (still common in Dutch homes of the era) in favour of more modern free-standing beds flanked by built-in closets. The master bedroom featured a circular window with a bespoke shutter and an enormous terrace – larger than the bedroom itself.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroomSybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroom – circular window and shutterSybold van Ravesteyn House, master bedroom – terrace
Each of the son’s bedroom and the guest room (where the family’s nanny stayed during her pregnancy, having been impregnated by Van Ravestyn himself – though this could have been a mistranslation!) each had their own basins and nightlights.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, upstairs landingSybold van Ravesteyn House, son and guest bedroom detailSybold van Ravesteyn House, son’s bedroom
Van Ravesteyn lived in the house until his nineties after which it was acquired and renovated by the Hendrick de Keyser Association. It has since served as a house museum and can be booked for overnight stays – something which gave the house a distinctly “lived in” feel.
Sybold van Ravesteyn House, open plan living room in use
Visiting the Rietveld Schröder House in Utrecht was like stepping into a physical representation of a Mondrian painting.
Rietveld Schröder House, exterior
Built in 1924 by the innovative architect Gerrit Rietveld (also famous for his Mondrian coded Red and Blue chair), the house was designed to be as much an artistic statement as a house in response to a brief from Truus Schröder-Schräder, a wealthy widowed mother of three with a penchant for avantgarde design.
Rietveld Schröder House, exterior and main entranceRietveld Schröder House, exterior
Rietveld, influenced by the De Stijl movement, aimed to create a space defined by flexibility, openness, and clarity. Though it was constructed during the same period as the traditional brick townhouses that surrounded it, it broke entirely from convention and is perhaps best known for its distinctive layout consisting of an adjustable open plan space that could be divided into separate rooms via a system of sliding panels.
Despite being brick-built, the house looked as if it was made from concrete with its clean, white plaster surfaces and intersecting planes giving it a strikingly modern appearance even today. The building stood in sharp contrast to the neighbouring houses (and the terrace that it bookended) due to its abstract, cubic form and bold accents in red, black, and yellow.
Rietveld Schröder House, exteriorRietveld Schröder House, close up of plaque
A thin red line across the façade of the house highlighted where to deliver parcels, blending functional design with visual clarity, a typical Rietveld detail. Also noticeable were structural beams and posts that ran from outside the house to inside, seamlessly connecting the interior to the exterior and a speaking tube that allowed Truus Schröder-Schräder to communicate with visitors at the front door from the first floor without having to go downstairs.
Rietveld Schröder House, exteriorRietveld Schröder House, interior light fittingandbeam running from interior to exterior of house
Ground Floor
The ground floor followed a traditional layout, divided into rooms for practical functions like cooking, working, and storage. The hallway was compact with a short flight of white steps leading upward beside a built-in bench. A wall unit accommodated storage for four occupants, and the coat rack was designed with both high and low sections, catering to both adults and children.
The kitchen was equipped with features far ahead of its time: one of the first dishwashers, wall cabinets with sliding glass doors, a drop-down shelf by the window for deliveries and detachable shutters on the windows. The thick exposed pipes on the wall gave the room a modern, slightly industrial feel.
The kitchen flowed through into the maid’s room, painted a cheerful sunny yellow to counteract the distinct lack of light. Unusually for the time, this room was wired for electricity and had its own sink and direct access to the garden, reflecting the importance placed by Rietveld and Truus Schröder-Schräder on maintaining independence and dignity for domestic workers. Later, this small space was rented to students.
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor kitchenRietveld Schröder House, ground floor maid’s room (with its own sink and access to garden) and workspace
Also on the ground floor was a workspace and a front room featuring a distinctive ceiling lamp, the design of which drew the eye upward, helping visitors perceive the three-dimensional volume of the room.
Rietveld Schröder House, ground floor front room with ceiling lampRietveld Schröder House, ground floor front room
First Floor
The first floor contained the most distinctive features of the house. Designed as a space for living during the day and sleeping at night, it was officially listed as an attic to sidestep local building regulations.
Rietveld Schröder House, first floorskylight and open plan living area Rietveld Schröder House, first floor demonstration of sliding panels
This was necessary because the whole of the upper floor was an open plan space with no fixed walls that could be divided into separate rooms using sliding and revolving panels, or left open as a single large area. A central living room, originally boasting panoramic views (now somewhat obscured), featured built-in storage (including a striking yellow cupboard in the corner resembling a modernist sculpture), a skylight and the same three dimensional ceiling lamp as the one on the ground floor.
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor central living room Rietveld Schröder House, first floor central living room with yellow cupboard unit
The daughter’s bedroom was designed to be multi-functional: a sitting room by day, and a bedroom for two by night. The son’s room was more experimental with a floor made from a patchwork of different colours and materials and detachable wall panels in lieu of curtains for privacy. An early version of a spotlight illuminated the room, showing Rietveld’s interest in modern lighting techniques.
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor daughter’s bedroom Rietveld Schröder House, first floor son’s bedroom (with Rietveld’s Red and Blue chair)
The main bedroom, used by Schröder herself, was surprisingly the smallest in the house. Rietveld, however, used the space very efficiently, incorporating a built-in washbasin, a fold-out cupboard and a narrow red shelf just wide enough to hold a watch or small personal items.
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor bathroom and (small) main bedroomRietveld Schröder House, first floor stairway and concealed door to separate toilet
The bathroom was tucked between the mother’s and daughters’ rooms and featured a granite hip bath and a sliding vent hatch for fresh air—compact, yet luxurious for the time. The separate toilet was tucked away behind a black painted door.
Rietveld Schröder House, first floor open plan areaRietveld Schröder House, staircase to first floor
Though the family was wealthy, the house was decidedly modest in size, built on a tight urban plot. The constraints caused by the small plot were part of the creative challenge for Rietveld, who embraced the opportunity to build something innovative without the luxury of unlimited space and scale.
Truus Schröder-Schräder lived in the house until her death in 1985. The house was then restored by Bertus Mulder and now is a museum open for visits, run by the Centraal Museum. It has been a listed monument since 1976 and UNESCO World Heritage Site since 2000. An exhibition on the house and Rietveld’s other designs form part of the permanent collection at the Centraal Musuem in central Utrecht.
Model of Rietveld Schröder HouseMiniature models of chairs in Rietveld Schröder House
Although no one associates Sicily with modernist architecture, I visited the striking concrete Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime (Sanctuary of the Virgin of Tears) during a recent trip to Syracuse.
View of Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime from Greek Theatre of Syracuse
Designed by French architects Michel Andrault and Pierre Parat, the basilica was the winning entry in an international competition involving architects from 17 different countries. Construction began in 1966 but wasn’t completed until 1994 due to the building’s complex engineering, archaeological discoveries, funding issues, and controversy surrounding its bold modernist design.
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior views and detailsBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior
Though originally intended to be even taller, the structure still reached 103 metres, its reinforced concrete cone tapering sharply upward and crowned with a bronze statue of the Virgin by Francesco Caldarella. The result is compared to a teardrop falling from heaven or, less flatteringly, to an upside-down ice cream cone. Approaching the basilica, the first impression was one of scale. The exterior was monumental and unmistakably modern, its geometric form visible from almost anywhere in the city.
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior of one of the 16 chapels positioned around the perimeterBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, exterior views and detailsBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, lower level
Inside, the space was vast yet calm. The interior was circular in plan, 71 metres in diameter and designed to hold up to 11,000 standing or 6,000 seated visitors. Sixteen chapels were positioned around the perimeter, while the central altar – crafted from white marble and local Modica stone by Giancarlo Marchese – held the image of the Madonna delle Lacrime alongside an 18th-century cross. The interior’s height and symmetry were softened by diffused natural light entering from above.
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interiorBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime,concrete rib ceilingBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior pews
The basilica’s striking ceiling featured a dramatic radial pattern of concrete ribs that rose and tapered toward the centre, drawing the eye upwards.
Basilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interiorpewsBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interiordetailsBasilica of the Madonna delle Lacrime, interior
The design of the basilica was, and remains, controversial. Some see it as an eyesore, others as a daring and spiritually resonant work of modern architecture.
Lisbon was not exactly brimming with modernist architecture but I did manage to seek out a church, a gallery and a public building that were of interest to me aesthetically.
Sagrado Coração Church
Fairly inconspicuous from the street, Sagrado Coração Church was tucked between residential buildings and offices with its entrance elevated above street level.
Sagrado Coração Church exterior from street level
The church and its accompanying annexes were designed and built by Nuno Teotónio Pereira and Nuno Portas between 1962 and 1970 on a small plot of land in central Lisbon.
Sagrado Coração Church, platform in front of church entranceSagrado Coração Church, exterior detailSagrado Coração Church, exterior detail
To optimise the small amount of space, the church and its annexes were distributed across a number of different levels united by a large uncovered public area connecting every entrance to the plot via different platforms.
Sagrado Coração Church, uncovered public areaSagrado Coração Church, uncovered public areaand seatingSagrado Coração Church, uncovered public area
The interior of the church was similarly multi-levelled with the different sections spread across multiple levels linked by staircases and platforms. The layout encouraged movement compared to a standard single-storey church, almost as if it was designed for people to be part of the space rather than just sitting in it.
The design was dominated by concrete and glass with striking lines running across the ceiling in a geometric pattern. The interior space was designed in such a way to allow light to filter in at the right angles to cast soft shadows and play off the textures of the concrete, which contributed to a decidedly peaceful, reflective atmosphere.
Artificial lighting by way of distinctive lantern-shaped lamps had been placed thoughtfully throughout the space to complement the natural light.
Sagrado Coração Church, interior
Gulbenkian Museum
The Gulbenkian Museum was part of a modernist complex in Lisbon, designed by Portuguese architects Ruy d’Athouguia, Alberto Pessoa, and Pedro Cid. Built in the late 1960s and opened in 1969, the museum was created specifically to display its collection, unlike many older museums that occupied repurposed buildings.
Gulbenkian Museumexterior
The design of the buildings reflected modernist principles, with low, horizontal structures made of concrete, stone and bronze-tinted glass. In 1975, the complex won the Valmor Prize for architecture, and in 2010, it was recognized as a National Monument—the first contemporary building in Portugal to receive this status.
The Main Museum Building
The main building museum was low and spread out, its concrete surfaces softened by the surrounding trees and water features.
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance hallGulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance exteriorGulbenkian Museum main museum building entrance hall
Inside, the use of wood, stone, and carpeting contrasted with the concrete exterior and large windows throughout the space framed views of the surrounding gardens and let natural light into the galleries.
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery courtyardGulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery spaceGulbenkian Museum main museum building seating area
The museum’s design used nature as the backdrop to both the artwork (mostly traditional in style) and architecture.
Gulbenkian Museum main museum building gallery space
The Foundation’s Headquarters
Adjacent to the museum were the headquarters of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters open plan area connecting concert hallsGulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters corridor and seatingGulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquartersopen plan area connecting concert halls
This building shared the same modernist design as the main museum with a modular structure that emphasised clean lines and simple materials.
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters concert hall lobbyGulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters concert hall lobbyGulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters
The layout consisted of large open plan areas connecting the concert halls, public spaces and administrative offices that made up the building. These vast carpeted areas were punctuated with attractive mid-century furniture, some of it built into the space.
Gulbenkian Museum Foundation’s Headquarters
The Gulbenkian Garden
The buildings were surrounded by the Gulbenkian Garden, a 7.5-hectare green space designed by landscape architects António Viana Barreto and Gonçalo Ribeiro Telles.
Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardensGulbenkian Museum exterior and gardensGulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens
The garden was created in the late 1960s as part of the modernist movement in Portugal, using natural vegetation in a way that broke from traditional landscaping styles. It was designed to feel like a natural extension of the museum, with winding paths, open spaces, and water features that reflected the minimalist style of the buildings.
Gulbenkian Museum exterior and gardens
The CAM Building and Kengo Kuma’s Redesign
At the far end of the Gulbenkian garden was the CAM (Centro de Arte Moderna) building, originally designed by British architect Sir Leslie Martin and opened in 1983.
Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building exteriorGulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building exterior and interiorGulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna building covered walkway
This building recently underwent an extensive redesign by Japanese architect Kengo Kuma, known for his work that merges architecture with nature. His new design featured a 100-metre-long canopy made of Portuguese ceramic tiles, inspired by the Japanese Engawa—a covered walkway that creates a transition between indoor and outdoor spaces. This space housed a collection of modern and contemporary Portuguese art.
Gulbenkian Museum Centro de Arte Moderna interior gallery space
Palace of Justice in Lisbon
The Palace of Justice was a striking brutalist building, designed by architects Januário Godinho and João Henrique de Breloes Andresen.
Palace of Justice exterior
Standing at the head of Parque Eduardo VII, a large green space in the center of Lisbon,it was built between 1962 and 1970 and serves as the city’s main court.
Palace of Justice exteriorPalace of Justice exteriordetailPalace of Justice exterior colonnades
The building was long and rectangular, with large concrete columns supporting its cantilevered facade on all sides. This design made it look as if it was slightly lifted off the ground, giving it an unexpected sense of lightness despite its monolithic size. The materials and structure were typical of brutalism – strong, geometric, and functional – but with a unique Portuguese touch. Instead of the raw, heavy concrete often seen in brutalist buildings, the facade here was decorated with geometric patterns and rhythmic textures. This detail softened the building’s appearance, reflecting Portugal’s penchant for a patterned tile. The interplay of light and shadow on the textured concrete created a dynamic effect which must change throughout the day.
Palace of Justice exteriorPalace of Justice exteriorPalace of Justice exterior
I wasn’t able to blag my way into the building, unfortunately, but was glad to visit its imposing facade in person.